Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Church v. Kijakazi
as 7:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Church, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gibson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wyche v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wyche
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Field v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2011cv00049
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Field
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2011cv00046
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Keel v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00561
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Keel
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stephens v. Astrue et al
as 3:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lynn Stephens and Patricia Lynn Stephens
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hanna v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hanna
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hereford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hereford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PAGANS v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 7:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Garrett Stephen Pagans, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
