Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Andrew Shane Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2022cv04724
Plaintiff:
Bryan Shane Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lawson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv02566
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pennell v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv03569
Plaintiff:
Shane Ray Pennell
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dandridge v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2016cv01020
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Shane Dandridge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dandridge v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2012cv03066
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Shane Dandridge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Revis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv01017
Plaintiff:
Bryan Shane Revis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Revis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2011cv01017
Plaintiff:
Bryan Shane Revis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
