Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Schultz v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Toni Schultz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hornsby v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06047
Plaintiff:
Toni D Hornsby
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ferraro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Tony Thomas Ferraro
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ellinghausen v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03026
Plaintiff:
Toni Michele Ellinghausen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ferraro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00715
Plaintiff:
Commissioner of Social Security and Tony Thomas Ferraro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mothe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05856
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Toni Marie Mothe
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05851
Plaintiff:
Tony Brill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Calhoun v. Saul
as 4:2020cv05122
Plaintiff:
Tony Calhoun
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Leonard v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00221
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Toni Lynn Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv06140
Plaintiff:
Tony Miller
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
