Social Security Cases filed in Tennessee
Warren v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00077
Plaintiff: Tammy Warren and Tammy M. Warren
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schindler v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00043
Plaintiff: Warren George Schindler, Jr.
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hastings v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01083
Plaintiff: Thomas Warren Hastings
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Warren v. Commissioner of Social Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00313
Plaintiff: Melinda Joy Warren
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Davis v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv02534
Plaintiff: Warren Keith Davis
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Warren v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2012cv00093
Plaintiff: Brenda Qualls Warren
Defendant: Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Warren v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00178
Plaintiff: Carol Warren
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bonds v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv02195
Miscellaneou: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: Warren Bonds and Warren Bonds
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Warren v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01083
Plaintiff: Barbara D. Warren
Defendant: Michael Astrue, David Kustoff and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?