Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bettis-Taylor v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Kirell F. Bettis-Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2019cv00357
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Patricia Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Johnson v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, US Department of Justice and David Nuffer
Plaintiff:
Neldon Paul Johnson
Not Yet Classified:
Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howell v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Samuel Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Gibbs v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00539
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Amber M. Smith, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
William C. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6330
Ku et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2016cv01147
Plaintiff:
Wenwei Ku and Ling Tang
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Shields v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2016cv00554
Plaintiff:
Karen Shields
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tanne et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2015cv00296
Plaintiff:
James S. Tanne and Megan M. Tanne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402 Refund of Taxes
Zaccardi v. USA et al
as 2:2007cv00437
Petitioner:
Paul Ben Zaccardi
Respondent:
USA and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Zaccardi v. USA et al
as 2:2007cv00439
Plaintiff:
Frances Zizzo Zaccardi
Respondent:
USA and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
