Cases 21 - 30 of 52
United States of America v. Mallery et al
as 1:2013cv01737
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael P Mallery and Rebeca C Mallery
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States of America v. Steven Baileys et al
as 8:2013cv00966
Defendant:
Alvin and Geraldine Baileys Foundation, Jeremy E Baileys, Steven J Baileys and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Sedmak v. Bonin et al
as 3:2013cv00940
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Sedmak
Defendant:
Pamela S. Bonin, Douglas P. Weinert, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Richard P Chavira v. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2012cv02252
Plaintiff:
Richard P Chavira
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
United States v. Laughlin et al
as 2:2012at01053
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Robert S. Laughlin and Barbra P. Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States v. Laughlin et al
as 2:2012cv01990
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Robert S. Laughlin and Barbra P. Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Gregory Wolflick et al
as 2:2012cv00370
Defendant:
Provident Funding Associates L P, State of California Franchise Tax Board, Gregory Wolflick and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Michael P Citrone et al v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv10154
Plaintiff:
Leanne J Citrone and Michael P Citrone
Defendant:
United States of America
Franklin S. Cibula Corporation-v-United States Department of Treasury, et al
as 5:2011cv05383
Defendant:
Franklin S. Cibula Corporation , Mark H Cibula , United States Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
Sherman M Unell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael P Romano v. Douglas H Shulman et al
as 2:2011cv08303
Respondent:
Richard E Byrd, Jr, Timothy Geithner and Douglas H Shulman
Petitioner:
Michael P Romano
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
