Cases 81 - 90 of 192
NELLY HOME CARE, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
NELLY HOME CARE, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
O'CONNOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. O'CONNOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv07365
Petitioner:
JAMES V. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
WOOD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv06537
Plaintiff:
MOIRA D. WOOD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
ROSEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv06520
Plaintiff:
MARK S. ROSEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT v. RETOS et al
as 2:2014cv00972
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
GEORGE RETOS, JR. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Garban et al v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00891
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Garban , Scott G. Shamrock , Gary E. Byers and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
FATTAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
CHAKA FATTAH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
MCILHENNY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2013cv06552
Plaintiff:
ELEANORE R. MCILHENNY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HRONIS
as 5:2013cv05054
Defendant:
TAMMY HRONIS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and E. G. KOVATCH
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
