Cases 91 - 100 of 584
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2013cv03002
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Racheal Marie Ferguson and Marcene Marie McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Communications Act of 1994
Joe Hand Promotions Inc et al v. Haresh Kantilal Patel et al
as 2:2013cv04716
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Haresh Kantilal Patel, Punita Rakesh Patel and Rakesh Patel
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. George Thanos et al
as 5:2013cv01156
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Mr T's Inc and George Thanos
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. George Thanos et al
as 5:2013cv01155
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Mr T'S and George Thanos
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Dorado et al
as 3:2013cv01510
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Carmen Varela Dorado and Narcisco Cortes Dorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Affinito et al
as 4:2013cv03003
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Dominic J. Affinito and Juliette C. Affinito
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Communications Act of 1994
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. John B Webb et al
as 2:2013cv04463
Defendant:
Ted Doupe and John B Webb
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Luis Fernando Baez et al
as 5:2013cv01101
Defendant:
Luis Fernando Baez and Anne Gehlke-Baez
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Machuca et al
as 2:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ruben Contreras Machuca and Silvia Ochoa Gomez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Chan et al
as 1:2013cv00767
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sidney Sikyam Chan and Centre Plaza Catering Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
