Cases 91 - 100 of 291
Louis Vaiz v. United Parcel Service, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv02165
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50 Inclusive and United Parcel Service Inc
Plaintiff:
Louis Vaiz
Eric Aguilar v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv02169
Plaintiff:
Eric Aguilar
Defendant:
Does, United Parcel Service Co. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Unknown:
Amber M Grayhorse
In re: Randall Holl v. USDC-CAOAK
as 18-70568
:
In re: RANDALL HOLL
Petitioner:
RANDALL HOLL, individually, on behalf of others similarly situated, and as a representative of the class,
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
PUBLIC COUNSEL, PUBLIC GOOD LAW CENTER and PUBLIC LAW CENTER
Brandon Vawter v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv01318
Defendant:
Does and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Vawter
Mario Rodriguez v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00012
Defendant:
Does and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodriguez
Markel Insurance Company v. The UPS Store, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Markel Insurance Company
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Diamond Banks v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv02400
Plaintiff:
Diamond Banks
Defendant:
Does, Dolrell Knight and United Parcel Service, Inc.
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. John Does 1-5
as 1:2017cv03843
Plaintiff:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Jarvis Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06773
Defendant:
Does and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Williams
Bolar v. Harris et al
as 1:2017cv02972
Plaintiff:
Shelia Mariah Bolar
Defendant:
Shaun L. Harris, K.E. Dean, Iain MacGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
