Cases 101 - 110 of 3,359
Oliver Dusabe v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2686
Petitioner:
OLIVER DUSABE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Buckler v. Austin, III, et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Philip Traugott Buckler
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, United States Department of Defense, Christine Wormuth and others
Maria Reynoso-Salgado v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2628
Petitioner:
MARIA REYNOSO-SALGADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Edwin Portillo Flores, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2860
Petitioner:
Edwin Omar Portillo Flores, B.O.P.M., Yeny Any Mozo De Portillo and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Anthology, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 9:2023cv81153
Plaintiff:
Anthology, Inc.
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mathew Williams, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2585
Petitioner:
MATHEW CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and YOHANCE CHRISTIAN MILLINGTON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
David Hernandez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2824
Petitioner:
David Torres Hernandez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Lilia Salinas v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2779
Petitioner:
Lilia Mercedes Salinas
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Valles v. Attorney General of the United States, et al.
as 23-1674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW VALLES
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UTAH
Jhonattan Mendoza-Tornez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2501
Petitioner:
JHONATTAN WILLIAM MENDOZA-TORNEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
