Cases 111 - 120 of 131
AMOROSO v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01037
Plaintiff:
DEREK AMOROSO
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC , BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES N.A., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BAPTISTE v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06923
Plaintiff:
BRIAN W. BAPTISTE, SR.
Defendant:
NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., NATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, NRA GROUP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
COX v. CAPITAL ONE BANK et al
as 2:2010cv06812
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. COX, III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GRIMES v. CAPITAL ONE BANK
as 2:2010cv01051
Plaintiff:
MARK GRIMES
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WALTHER v. PATEL et al
as 2:2010cv00706
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALTHER
Defendant:
NALIN PATEL , FAIRLESS HILLS DENTAL CENTER, INC. , ADVANCED DENTAL CARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CAMPBELL v. PATENAUDE & FELIX et al
as 2:2009cv04115
Plaintiff:
MILDRED CAMPBELL
Defendant:
PATENAUDE & FELIX, GREGG L. MORRIS and CAPITAL ONE BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
