Cases 121 - 130 of 8,123
JACKSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00181
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER T. JACKSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Sancho v. Jackson County, et al.
as 24-638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN ANTHONY SANCHO
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY, DAVID L. DALTON, BRADY BJORKLAND and others
Hill v. Wise, et al.
as 24-605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD WISE, Unit Sgt., 2nd-shift, JON COERS, Classification Counselor 1, AARON KERSHAW, Unit Sgt., 3rd-shift and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. City of Houston
as 24-20047
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Janice Jackson, Individually and as representative of the estate of Michael Wayne Jackson, Arlene Gallien, individually and as representative of the estate of Carl Wiley, Jr., Camila Simpson, as next friend Xxxxxxx Xxxxx a minor child and others
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Houston
USA v. Rodney Jackson
as 24-10315
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODNEY TERRELL JACKSON
USA v. Mario Jackson
as 24-3075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO L. JACKSON
Spengler v. TTCF Eye Clinic, et al.
as 24-537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant / Appellee:
TTCF EYE CLINIC, TTCF TOWER TWO CLINIC, RICHARD MACHADO, individually as Detective, Pomona Police and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
