Cases 131 - 140 of 2,348
Stivers v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Susan Stivers
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stivers v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 4:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Susan Stivers
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Schulman v. Winnebago Industries, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv03034
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Schulman and Andrew J Schulman
Defendant:
Winnebago Industries, Inc., Winnebago Industries, Inc and Volta Power Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Hoy v. VantageCare Insurance LLC
as 4:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Toby Hoy
Defendant:
VantageCare Insurance LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Qwest Corporation v. Langman Construction, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Qwest Corporation and Qwest Corporation doing business as CenturyLink QC
Defendant:
Langman Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0551 Cable Communications Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
