Cases 171 - 180 of 3,039
Sullivan v. Graham et al
as 2:2022cv02319
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant:
John M. Graham, Jr., Melinda Young, David Clymer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Delap v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stephen Delap
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schmitendorf v. Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02293
Plaintiff:
BRADY SCHMITENDORF
Defendant:
JUICY'S VAPOR LOUNGE INC. and Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
