Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TAGLIALATELA v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA et al
as 2:2016cv01319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. TAGLIALATELA, JR.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, DEBRA ZITOMER, R. DOUGLAS BILLET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AURANDT v. BROWN et al
as 3:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL AURANDT
Defendant:
CAREY V. BROWN, RONALD BEAVER, CREDIT PAYMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
DAI v. BEERS et al
as 2:2013cv06538
Plaintiff:
KUN DAI
Defendant:
RAND BEERS , ALEJANDROS MAYORKAS , GREGORY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
DAY v. WELLS FARGO AUTO FINANCE, INC.
as 5:2013cv04085
Plaintiff:
TAISHA DAY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO AUTO FINANCE, INC.
Counter_claimant:
WELLS FARGO AUTO FINANCE, INC.
Counter_defendant:
TAISHA DAY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
DAYS INN WORLDWIDE, INC. v. MONIKENA, INC., et al
as 2:2013mc00123
Plaintiff:
DAYS INN WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
MONIKENA, INC., et al
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN EAST, INC. v. DAY et al
as 2:2012cv05776
Plaintiff:
KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN EAST, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL DAY and PATRICE DAY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
v. NATURALIZATION CEREMONY LAW DAY
as 2:2012mc00092
Defendant:
NATURALIZATION CEREMONY LAW DAY
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
DAY v. CITY OF GALVESTON et al
as 2:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
TIM T. DAY
Defendant:
CITY OF GALVESTON, SIMPSON GALLERIES and GALVESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAY & ZIMMERMANN, INC. et al v. SOC-SMG, INC.
as 2:2011cv06008
Plaintiff:
DAY & ZIMMERMANN, INC. and THE DAY & ZIMMERMANN GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
SOC-SMG, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
