Cases 11 - 20 of 690
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY et al v. THISTLE et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY and RICE DRILLING B LLC
Respondent:
HAROLD W THISTLE, JR and GAY E THISTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
SHELTON v. ATYG, LLC
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SHELTON
Defendant:
ATYG LLC doing business as STEADY CAPITAL SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
K M MINI MARKET, A PENNSYLVANIA SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv04508
Plaintiff:
K M MINI MARKET and KLERVEE E. MARTE-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SHELTON v. WHITE BRIDGE FUNDING GROUP, LLC
as 2:2023cv04421
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SHELTON
Defendant:
WHITE BRIDGE FUNDING GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Williams et al v. FCA US LLC
as 4:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Harry E Williams, III and Alysse R Williams
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Williams et al v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2023cv03603
Plaintiff:
Harry E Williams, III and Alysse R Williams
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023mc00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WILLIAMS v. PROMEDICA HEALTH SYSTEMS INC.
as 2:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
DARRELL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PROMEDICA HEALTH SYSTEMS INC. trading and doing business as PROMEDICA SKLLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION (GREENTREE) trading and doing business as MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES-GREENTREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
