Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MAYS v. CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2016cv01151
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ADDISON LAMONT MAYS
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INCORPORATED v. STEPHAN, et al
as 1:2015cv01832
Defendant:
JIM HUSTON, CAROLINE R. MAYS-MEDLEY, SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Holland et al v. The City of Gary et al
as 2:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland and The Law Firm of Robert Holland
Defendant:
The City of Gary , Rudy Clay , Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2014 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2014mc00062
Respondent:
Sara Elizabeth Corbat, Danel Michelle Nickels, Duane Jonathan Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
EUTSEY v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2012mc00079
Defendant:
JAMES BASSINGER, JOSEPH BAUMBERGER, HEATHER BLASINGAME and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN EUTSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00034
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
