Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Byron Lee v. AT&T Services, Inc./Pacific Bell, et al
as 2:2017cv04642
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., Jaime V. Benavides, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Lee
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 8:2016mc00022
Defendant:
AT&T Communications of Texas, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Operations, Inc. and others
Miscellaneou:
Broadcom Corporation
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 3:2016mc80156
Movant:
Marcos Tzannes
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp. , AT&T Communications of Texas, LLC , AT&T Operations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv04997
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Trinity Grand Marketing, LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv04377
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., Fulfillment Plus, Inc. and Fulfillment Plus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trinity Grand Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
La Collina Dal Lago, L.P. et al v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al
as 3:2008cv02451
Plaintiff:
La Collina Dal Lago, L.P., La Collina Dal Lago, L.P., La Collina Dal Lago, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Struyk et al v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01314
Plaintiff:
Todd Struyk, Todd Struyk, Cathy Scherzer and others
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
