Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Young v. Lee et al
as 2:2015mc00013
Petitioner:
Douglas Wayne Young
Respondent:
Randy Lee and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2015mc00017
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Attorney General and others
Flores v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 1:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
US Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Moses v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2014cv02946
Petitioner:
Pamela J. Moses
Respondent:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, Attorney General, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Haslam et al
as 3:2014mc00917
Petitioner:
Kenneth Peterson
Respondent:
Bill Haslam and The Tenn. Attorney General
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter
Defendant:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Other Statutory Actions
Patton v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 3:2012mc00065
Petitioner:
Anthony Patton
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Lynch v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00028
Plaintiff:
William J. Lynch
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Probation & Parole, Tennessee Board of and District Attorney General's Office
Pruitt v. Lester et al
as 3:2011mc00031
Petitioner:
Rodrigues Pruitt
Respondent:
Jerry Lester and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Rutland v. United States Attorney General for State of Alabama
as 3:2011mc00003
Plaintiff:
Clarence Rutland
Defendant:
United States Attorney General for State of Alabama
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
