Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Boston Retirement System v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04294
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan et al v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv03985
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Banco Santander (Mexico) S.A. Institucion De Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero and others
Plaintiff: Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan and Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 14
The San Mateo County Investment Pool v. Fuld
as 1:2009cv01239
Defendant: John F. Akers, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Erin Callan and others
Plaintiff: The San Mateo County Investment Pool and Madeline Dimodica
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Varela v. Republic of Argentina
as 16-667
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marta Azucena Vazquez, Teresa Munoz De Corral, Lila Ines Burgueno and others
Defendant / Appellee: Republic of Argentina
Defendant: BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., BBVA Securities Inc. and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Petitioner: Montreux Partners, L.P., Wilton Capital, EM Ltd. and others
Amicus Curiae: United States of America
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
as 16-664
Petitioner: Montreux Partners, L.P., EM Ltd., Cordoba Capital and others
Defendant / Appellee: The Republic of Argentina
Plaintiff / Appellant: Aurelius Opportunities Fund II, LLC and Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd.
3Rd Party Defendant: BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and BBVA Securities Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America
Aurelius Opportunities Fund II v. Republic of Argentina
as 16-659
Petitioner: Montreux Partners, L.P., EM Ltd., Cordoba Capital and others
Defendant / Appellee: The Republic of Argentina
Plaintiff / Appellant: Aurelius Opportunities Fund II, LLC and Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd.
3Rd Party Defendant: BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. and BBVA Securities Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America
NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
as 16-661
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Class Intervenors
Defendant: Unidos S.A. AFJP, Union de Administradoras de Fondos De Jubilacions Y Pensiones, Profesion+Auge AFJP S.A. and others
Defendant / Appellee: The Republic of Argentina
Petitioner: Montreux Partners, L.P., Cordoba Capital, EM Ltd. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. and BBVA Securities Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: NML Capital, Ltd.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
as 16-653
Defendant / Appellee: Republic of Argentina
Petitioner: Montreux Partners, L.P., EM Ltd., Cordoba Capital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Aurelius Opportunities Fund II, LLC and Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd.
3Rd Party Defendant: BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. and BBVA Securities Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America
Olifant Fund, Limited v. The Republic of Argentina
as 16-650
Petitioner: Montreux Partners, L.P., Cordoba Capital, EM Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee: The Republic of Argentina
3Rd Party Defendant: BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. and BBVA Securities Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: Olifant Fund, Limited
Amicus Curiae: United States of America
NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
as 16-669
Petitioner: Montreux Partners, L.P., Cordoba Capital, EM Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee: The Republic of Argentina
Defendant: BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and BBVA Securities Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: NML Capital, Ltd.
3Rd Party Defendant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?