Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Crumpton v. Fett's City Motor Center, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Daniel Crumpton
Defendant:
Fett's City Motor Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
McGill et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama
as 8:2016cv00147
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Missouri, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nevada, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff:
Brian McGill, Rochelle McGill and Sadler Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Krause v. City of Omaha
as 8:2015cv00197
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Krause
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Halverson v. The City of Omaha
as 8:2014cv00312
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Jarvis Duncan and Doug Johnson
Plaintiff:
Oliver Halverson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Turner v. Kansas Counselors of Kansas City, Inc.
as 4:2014cv03162
Defendant:
Kansas Counselors of Kansas City, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Turner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Turner v. Kansas Counselors of Kansas City, Inc.
as 4:2014cv03164
Defendant:
Kansas Counselors of Kansas City, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Turner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Scott v. Schuster et al
as 4:2014cv03093
Defendant:
City of Beatrice, Dennis M. Schuster and Tobias Tempelmeyer
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. v. City of North Platte, Nebraska
as 4:2014cv03088
Defendant:
City of North Platte, Nebraska
Plaintiff:
NE Colorado Cellular
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0251 Telecommunications Act of 1996
Krause v. City of Omaha
as 8:2014cv00094
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Krause
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rhodes v. City of Phoenix
as 4:2013cv03008
Defendant:
City of Phoenix
Plaintiff:
David E. Rhodes
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
