Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore, et al v. Shapiro & Burson, LLP
as 3:2014cv00832
Plaintiff:
Eric S Moore, Sr. and Brenda Moore
Defendant:
Shapiro & Burson, LLP , Aaron Reed , Robert Jones and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Sandra Waters-Levy , Christian Andrade , Camille Barnett and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Law Offices of Shapiro & Burson, LLP , Shapiro & Burson, LLP , Professional Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Feralloy Corporation v. Spig Industry Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00055
Defendant:
Wade Cook and Spig Industry Inc
Counter Defendant:
Feralloy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Feralloy Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Spig Industry Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ford Motor Credit Company v. Prestige Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00045
Interested Party:
Bankruptcy-Roanoke
Defendant:
Nathan Cook, Internal Revenue Service, New Peoples Bank, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ford Motor Credit Company
Debtor:
Prestige Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc00052
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Trevor G. Cook, Patrick J. Kiley, UBS Diversified Growth, LLC and others
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Cook et al
as 1:2009mc00053
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Trevor Cook, Patrick Kiley, Universal Brokerage FX and others
Financial Federal Credit, Inc. v. Cook et al
as 2:2007mc00013
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. Cook and Barbara A. Cook
Plaintiff:
Financial Federal Credit, Inc.
Austin v. Cooke
as 2:2007cv00376
Plaintiff:
Marva L. Austin
Defendant:
Richeryl Cooke
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
