Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
LUTTER v. JNESO et al
as 2:2019cv13478
Defendant: PAUL BOUDREAU, PAULA B. VOOS, JOHN BONANNI and others
Plaintiff: JODY LUTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant: AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others
PREFERRED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HASTICK et al
as 2:2012cv06747
Plaintiff: PREFERRED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: BERNARD HASTICK, DONNA HASTICK, ARNOLD GIANNETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
County of Niagara v. Voutour et al
as 1:2010cv01004
Plaintiff: County of Niagara and James R. Voutour
Defendant: County of Essex, Essex County Sheriff's Office and Armando B. Fontoura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
NEW JERSEY SAND HILL BAND OF LENAPE AND CHEROKEE INDIANS et al v. DE FACTO STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00683
Petitioner: NEW JERSEY SAND HILL BAND OF LENAPE AND CHEROKEE INDIANS and RONALD STACEY
Respondent: DE FACTO STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JON CORZINE, NINA WELLS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers, et al v. United States, et al
as 08-1209
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN ROGERS
Plaintiff: URBAN RENEWAL CORP SHELTER CLIENTS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN GENERAL ASSISTANCE AND TANF CLIENTS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ONW=E STOP GENERAL ASSISTANCE AND TANF CLIENTS and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?