Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Bobby Neal Lott v. Larry Witek, et al
as 2:1996cv03122
Respondent:
California Institute for Men, California State Attorney General, Daniel E Lungren, . and others
Petitioner:
Bobby Neal Lott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE UPTON
as 10-M955
Respondent:
Aref Fakhoury, Warden of California Institute for Men, Aref Fakhoury, Warden of California Institute for Men, Aref Fakhoury, Warden of California Institute for Men and others
Petitioner:
David Upton, David Upton, David Upton and others
Bass v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2008cv02135
Plaintiff:
Robert Curtis Bass Inc. and Robert Curtis Bass
Defendant:
County of San Diego, State of California, San Diego Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
Robert Bass v. County of San Diego, et al
as 09-56723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CURTIS BASS, Counsel
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and others
Robert Bass v. County of San Diego, et al
as 09-56723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CURTIS BASS, Counsel
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT and others
Robert Bass v. USDCSD
as 09-72917
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ROBERT CURTIS BASS, Counsel, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT CURTIS BASS, Counsel
Respondent:
USDC, SAN DIEGO
Robert Bass v. USDCSD
as 09-72917
:
In re: ROBERT CURTIS BASS, Counsel
Petitioner:
ROBERT CURTIS BASS, Counsel
Respondent:
USDC, SAN DIEGO
Real Party In Interest:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT and others
Tyrone Jacobs v. California Institution For Men
as 2:2007cv04897
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jacobs
Defendant:
California Institution For Men
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
