Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Harris v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-878
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., MICHAEL MINEV and others
Villanueva v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS VILLANUEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, MICHAEL MINEV, #9 AC, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Guzman v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-587
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCO GUZMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Respondent:
CALVIN JOHNSON and STATE OF NEVADA
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Allen v. Daniels, et al.
as 23-3471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAIWAN ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, MICHAEL MINEV and ISIDRIS BACA
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Cody v. DZS Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Robert Cody
Defendant:
DZS Inc., Charles Daniel Vogt and Misty Kawecki
Petitioner:
The Freedom Business Trust and The Life Trust, Keith Link and Trevor Milkins
Link v. DZS Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Keith Link and Trevor Milkins
Defendant:
DZS Inc., Charles Daniel Vogt and Misty Kawecki
Petitioner:
The Freedom Business Trust and The Life Trust
SHIM v. DZS INC et al
as 4:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
JASON SHIM
Defendant:
DZS INC, Charles Daniel Vogt and Misty Kawecki
Daniels v. Novant Health Inc et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels, Jr. and Clarence Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Novant Health Inc, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, The, Mecklenburg EMS Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
