Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MIAMI v. TROPICAL CITY GROUP, LLC, et al
as 1:2020mc25171
Plaintiff:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MIAMI
Defendant:
Mr. VOLODYMIR OGORODNYCHUK and TROPICAL CITY GROUP LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James Keppler, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 19-15509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES KEPPLER and KIFUMI KEPPLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CIT MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-1, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA Bank of New York, CITI GROUP SECURITIZATION CORPORATION III, INC. and others
Master GJG Atheea v. Florida Department of Motor Vehicle et al
as 1:2018cv23386
Plaintiff:
Master CJC Atheea and Master GJG Atheea
Defendant:
Citi Bank N.A., Florida Department of Motor Vehicle, Ana Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jack Finnegan v. USDC-CASA
as 17-73457
:
In re: JACK R. FINNEGAN
Petitioner:
JACK R. FINNEGAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA
Real Party In Interest:
CITI, DBA Citi Bank N.A., DBA Citi Corp Credit Services, DBA Citi Financial, DBA Citi Group, DBA Citi Mortgage, DBA Citi Retirement, DBA Citibank, DBA Citicorp
Jack R. Finnegan et al v. Citi, et al
as 8:2017cv01995
Defendant:
Maria C Chrislip, Citi, Citi Corp Credit Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jack R Finnegan
Finnegan v. CITI et al
as 8:2017cv01994
Defendant:
CITI, CITI BANK N.A., CITI CORP CREDIT SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Finnegan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
