Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BLANKENSHIP v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv12992
Defendant:
JANE/JOHN DOES 1-50, SCOTIA HOLDINGS (US) INC., THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY BLANKENSHIP
BLANKENSHIP v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv12988
Defendant:
SCOTIA CAPITAL (USA) INC., JANE/JOHN DOES 1-50, SCOTIA HOLDINGS (US) INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY BLANKENSHIP
PORT 22, LLC v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv12999
Defendant:
Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., Jane/John Does 1-50, COREY FLAUM and others
Plaintiff:
Port 22, LLC
BLANKENSHIP v. THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA et al
as 3:2020cv12998
Defendant:
Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., Jane/John Does 1-50, SCOTIA HOLDINGS (US) INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY BLANKENSHIP
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al v. Brenntag Mid-South Inc et al
as 2:2019cv21000
Plaintiff:
Fairfax County Water Authority, Winston-Salem, City of, Lynchburg, City of and others
Defendant:
BRENNTAG MID-SOUTH, INC., BRENNTAG SOUTHEAST, INC. and JOHN DOE 1-50
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK v. PURDUE PHARMA, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv17998
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, MALLINCKRODT, LLC, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
