Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Medina v. Buther
as 19-3348
Defendant:
Michelle Belgard, M.D., Gregg Esposito, Captain at Eastern Correctional Facility, Kevin Signore, Captain at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Anthony Medina
Defendant / Appellant:
New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision
Simmons v. Sheehan
as 19-1900
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Sheehan, Superintendent of Five Points Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tyrone Simmons
Parker v. Venettozzi
as 19-2087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marquis Lenox Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald Venettozzi, Director, Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program and D. Gleason, Captain, Five Points Correctional Facility
Rivera v. Colvin
as 19-1747
Petitioner / Appellant:
Iran Rivera, AKA Luis Vasquez
Respondent / Appellee:
John Colvin and Five Points Correctional Facility
Abreu v. Dougherty
as 19-586
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Garza, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, Mr. Sanatoro, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, L. Collins, Deputy Superintendent for Security, Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Mr. Venettozzi, William Dawson, Director of Correctional Dental Services, DOCCS, Miller, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Roberts v. Thomas
as 19-756
Petitioner / Appellant:
Vernon Roberts
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Thomas, Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility
Williams v. Poole
as 17-1151
Petitioner:
Mario Williams
Respondent:
Thomas Poole, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
Epps v. Poole
as 16-3005
Petitioner:
Darnell Epps
Respondent:
Thomas Poole, Warden, Five Points Correctional Facility
Saracina v. Sheahan
as 13-3906
Petitioner:
Scott A. Saracina
Respondent:
Michael Sheahan, Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
