Cases 11 - 20 of 97
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 12-15296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Pacific Coast Federation of, et al
as 12-15144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. LOCKE et al
as 1:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
GARY LOCKE and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Pacific Coast Federation of Fi, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 11-17108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, PORT ORFORD OCEAN RESOURCE TEAM and SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOCKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED CATCHER BOATS, MIDWATER TRAWLERS COOPERATIVE and ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 3:2011cv04195
Plaintiff:
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA and BAY PLANNING COALITION
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce , National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration , UNITED STATES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor_dft:
Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 4:2011cv04118
Plaintiff:
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA and BAY PLANNING COALITION
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce , National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration , UNITED STATES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor_dft:
Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 3:2011cv04118
Plaintiff:
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA and BAY PLANNING COALITION
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce , National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration , UNITED STATES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor_dft:
Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
KAHEA et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
KAHEA and Food & Water Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Michael D. Tosatto, Eric C. Schwaab and others
Cause Of Action: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Lingwood v. Department of Commerce, et al
as 2:2011cv01063
Plaintiff:
Vickie L Lingwood
Defendant:
Department of Commerce and Gary Locke
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2011cv01174
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL , CARPENTERS INDUSTRIAL COUNCIL , DOUGLAS TIMBER OPERATORS, INC. and others
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR and GARY LOCKE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
