Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Capik v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C. et al
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Leslie Capik
Defendant:
Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C., Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC and Merriman Investments, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Capik v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C. et al
as 1:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Leslie Capik
Defendant:
Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C., Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC and Merriman Investments, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Robinson et al
as 3:2010cv01708
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Robinson
Garnishee:
Harris Associates LP, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA , The Southern Company and others
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
