Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-158
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
John Doe, 1,
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 21-73
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
John Doe, 1,
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 20-4103
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer (badge #: 3185), sued in individual and official capacities, Keith Dietrich, NYPD Officer (shield #5779), John Doe, NYPD Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
John Doe, 1,
United States of America v. Zarrab (Turkiye Halk Bankasi)
as 20-3499
Defendant:
Mehmet Zafer Caglayan, Abi, Mehmet Hakan Atilla, Reza Zarrab, AKA Riza Sarraf and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S., AKA Halkbank
In Re: Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.
as 20-3008
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S.
In Re: Turkiye Halk Bankasi
as 19-4203
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S
Greenway Nutrients, Inc. v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2013cv01088
Plaintiff:
Greenway Nutrients, Inc.
Defendant:
Steve Blackburn , Stacy Blackburn , David Selakovic and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. John Halk
as 10-2381
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
John William Halk
United States v. John Halk
as 10-1569
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
John William Halk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
