Cases 11 - 20 of 48
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GILES, ARTIS HOUSTON, HORACE COPELAND and others
Defendant:
NFL PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL FILMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAMAGE v. HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ. P.C. et al
as 2:2013cv01590
Plaintiff:
EVELYN RAMAGE
Defendant:
HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ. P.C., HARRISON ROSS BYCK and CACH LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HIQUET et al v. LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, P.C. et al
as 2:2013cv00642
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HIQUET and MELISSA HIQUET
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, P.C., LAW FIRM OF ALLAN C. SMITH, P.C. and CACH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mahon v. Harrison Ross Byck, Esq., P.C.
as 3:2012cv01385
Plaintiff:
Patrick Mahon
Defendant:
Harrison Ross Byck, Esq., P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ALVAREZ v. LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, P.C.
as 2:2012cv01294
Plaintiff:
GLORIA ALVAREZ
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In the matter of the search of
as 4:2012mc00100
Plaintiff:
In the matter of the search of 463 Harrison Road and In the matter of the search of 2006 GMC Truck
ROGERS v. HARRISON ROSS BYCK P.C.
as 2:2011cv07397
Defendant:
HARRISON ROSS BYCK P.C.
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
