Other Statutes Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
ROMERO v. MADDEN
as 4:2018cv00017
Defendant: JAMIE MADDEN
Plaintiff: SHELLY ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1989 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03995
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00535
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00198
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00113
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SHELLEY et al v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 1:2014cv00709
Defendant: BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Plaintiff: JAMIE SHELLEY and RHIANNON SHELLEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SHELLEY et al v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00506
Defendant: OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Plaintiff: JAMIE SHELLEY and RHIANNON SHELLEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. NOBLE
as 1:2012cv01544
Plaintiff: JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant: JAMIE KRISTIN NOBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. NOBLE et al
as 1:2012cv01543
Plaintiff: JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant: JAMES MCFALL, DIANN MCINTOSH, DANIEL NOBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bostedt v. Blume Connelly Jordan Stucky & Lauer LLP
as 3:2012cv00335
Plaintiff: Jamie L Bostedt
Defendant: Blume Connelly Jordan Stucky & Lauer LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?