Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Tadesse v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2010cv11386
Plaintiff:
A. A. Tadesse
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and Denis Riordan
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv12011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Butt v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv12004
Plaintiff:
Saquib Basheer Butt
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., Evelyn Upchurch, Christine Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Salas Duran v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2009cv11830
Plaintiff:
Mario Salas Duran
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and Dennis Riordan
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Saissi et al v. Napolitano
as 1:2009cv11565
Plaintiff:
Khalid Saissi, Lamiae Saissi and Alejandro Mayorkas
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
