Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rocio Maynez v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2021cv03834
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Rocio Maynez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Espinoza v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 5:2021cv03113
Plaintiff:
Valentin Espinoza
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
William and Ave Bortz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2021cv00618
Defendant:
Arnie Singson, Joel Petriashvil-Reyes, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
William and Ave Bortz
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0632
Levon Saribekyan, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank,N.A., et al
as 2:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
LS Appliance & Electronics, Inc. and Levon Saribekyan
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK,N.A., Synchrony Bank, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Counter Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rafik Dilanyan, Glendora Appliance Inc. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Leonard Gumport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Juan Raymundo Ramos v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2021cv00204
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Juan Raymundo Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
David Daryl Jones v. Gabriela Vargas et al
as 2:2019cv04440
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Vargas Gabriela, Gabriela Vargas and others
Plaintiff:
David Daryl Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
