Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Velez Funes v. Garland
as 21-1823
Petitioner / Appellant: Angel H. Velez Funes
Respondent / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Thomas J. Feely, Field Office Director for Detention Removal and others
Forbes v. Garland
as 21-1507
Petitioner: Curry W. Forbes
Respondent: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Santiago Franco v. Searls
as 21-1189
Respondent: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Thomas J. Feely, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: Pedro Fernando Santiago Franco
Teran Rivera v. Searls
as 21-1035
Respondent / Appellee: Thomas Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Customs Enforcement, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, NY and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Roberto Carlos Teran Rivera
Singh v. Garland
as 21-866
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General, Jeffrey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Petitioner: Johal Saranjit Singh
Concepcion v. Garland
as 21-658
Respondent: Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, William P. Barr, United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner: Danilo Concepcion
Thomas v. Garland
as 21-526
Respondent: Thomas Brophy, Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting United States Attorney General, Merrick B. Garland, Acting United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner: Harvel Thomas
Rodriguez v. Garland
as 21-272
Respondent / Appellee: Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Nelson Sosa Rodriguez
Matos v. Garland
as 21-394
Respondent: Michael Ball, SDDO, Jeffrey Searls, Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Center, Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: Jesus Matos

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?