Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court: JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff: HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-11067
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through BILL MCCOLLUM , STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through HENRY McMASTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through JON BRUNING, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
In re: Robert Schwartz, et al
as 09-1447
Petitioner: ROBERT E. SCHWARTZ
Respondent: PAMELA PLOUGHE, Warden and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Pacheco v. Suthers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00273
Plaintiff: Jimmy Joseph Pacheco
Defendant: John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
In re: Allen, et al
as 08-1464
Petitioner: GENE ALLEN
Respondent: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, JOHN W. SUTHERS and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Conway et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00571
Plaintiff: VIBO Corporation, Inc., VIBO Corporation, Inc. and VIBO Corporation, Inc.
Defendant: Jack Conway, Troy King, Talis J. Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re Douglas Burns
as 08-1360
Petitioner: DOUGLAS BURNS
Respondent: JOHN W. SUTHERS and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?