Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GOSSELIN v. GOSSELIN et al
as 5:2013cv04989
Plaintiff:
KATE GOSSELIN
Defendant:
JONATHAN K. GOSSELIN, ROBERT HOFFMAN and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Federal Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK v. THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK et al
as 2:2012cv06259
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK
Defendant:
THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK , TD BANK, N.A. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WALTS v. MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. et al
as 5:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
DELANNE WALTS
Defendant:
MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C., TERENCE J. MCCABE, MARC S. WEISBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
KAVALIN v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00596
Plaintiff:
SHARI KAVALIN
Defendant:
NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JAMES E. BENSON et al v. LDC COLLECTION SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2009mc00125
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BENSON
Defendant:
LDC COLLECTION SYSTEMS, INC., LDC COLLECTION SYSTEMS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN UMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
KALMAN v. CORTES et al
as 2:2009cv00684
Plaintiff:
GEORGE KALMAN
Defendant:
PEDRO A. CORTES and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
