Cases 11 - 20 of 1,925
Barry Michaels v. Jefferson B. Sessions, et al
as 17-15279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY MICHAELS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS E. BRANDON, Deputy Director, Head of the Bureau of ATF, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General and LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Inna Argashokova v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III
as 17-1133
Petitioner:
INNA VLADISLAVOVNA ARGASHOKOVA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Marto Fahardo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-1121
Petitioner:
MARTO FAHARDO, a/k/a Marto Doe, a/k/a Marto Fajardo, a/k/a Marto Aroldo Diaz Fajardo
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Olga Bradford v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70216
Petitioner:
OLGA BRADFORD
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General and SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Pedro Pascaul-Juarez v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70215
Petitioner:
PEDRO PASCAUL-JUAREZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General and SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Cupertino Velasquez-Lopez v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70218
Petitioner:
CUPERTINO VELASQUEZ-LOPEZ, AKA Luis Daniel Perez-Marroquin
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General and SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Jaime Aguilar v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70214
Petitioner:
JAIME AGUILAR
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General and SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Marvin Ramirez-Aparicio v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70217
Petitioner:
MARVIN MOISES RAMIREZ-APARICIO, AKA Marvin Ramirez, AKA Marvin M. Ramirez
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General and SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Damir Jakupovic v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70219
Petitioner:
DAMIR JAKUPOVIC
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General and SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Palash D Costa v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-1097
Petitioner:
PALASH BENEDICT D COSTA, MAGDALINA MITHUN D COSTA, A.J.D. and others
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
