Cases 11 - 20 of 24
United States of America v. Douglas et al
as 2:2017mj30635
Defendant:
Kevin Scott Douglas and Katrina Lane Rickard
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Douglas et al
as 2:2017mj30635
Defendant:
Katrina Lane Rickard
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Findlay Industries, Inc. et al v. Panasonic Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv12338
Plaintiff:
Findlay Industries, Inc. and Saratoga Lane LLC
Defendant:
Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Mitsuba Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Electric Power Steering - Direct Purchaser Actions
as 2:2013cv01901
Plaintiff:
Saratoga Lane, LLC
Defendant:
JTEKT Corporation, JTEKT Automotive North America, Inc., Showa Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Saratoga Lane, LLC v. JTEKT Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv12181
Plaintiff:
Saratoga Lane, LLC
Defendant:
JTEKT Corporation, JTEKT Automotive North America, Inc., Showa Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Joe Hand Promotions, Incorporated v. Slippery Lanes, Incorporated et al
as 1:2015cv10395
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Incorporated
Defendant:
Slippery Lanes, Incorporated and Cora Jane Post
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crehan v. Maiden Lane LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00657
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Crehan
Defendant:
Maiden Lane LLC , Maiden Lane II LLC , Maiden Lane III LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Stiles v. AMF Lincoln Lanes
as 1:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Eugene Stiles
Defendant:
AMF Lincoln Lanes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lane v. RDK Collection Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv15473
Plaintiff:
Pat Lane
Defendant:
RDK Collection Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Shelby-Lane
as 2:2010mc51157
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Cynthia Shelby-Lane
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
