Cases 11 - 16 of 16
SCHWARZWAELDER v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.
as 2:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
CHERYL SCHWARZWAELDER
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED v. SCHWARZWAELDER
as 2:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Defendant:
CHERYL SCHWARZWAELDER
Mediator:
KENNETH BENSON
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
METCALF et al v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. et al
as 4:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
Linda Metcalf , Michelle Hartley , Filmwest Productions, LLC and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. , Lawrence R. Bellmore, Jr., Solar Wind Productions, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Lawrence R. Bellmore, Jr.
Cross_defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED v. ZIENCIK
as 2:2010cv01372
Plaintiff:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
Defendant:
BRYAN ZIENCIK
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
GAER v. EDUCATION MANAGEMENT CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv01061
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS N. GAER, OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Defendant:
EDUCATION MANAGEMENT CORP., TODD S. NELSON, EDWARD H. WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
METCALF et al v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. et al
as 5:2009cv03758
Plaintiff:
LINDA METCALF , MICHELLE HARTLEY , FILMWEST PRODUCTIONS, LLC and others
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. , LAWRENCE R. BELLMORE, JR. , SOLAR WIND PRODUCTIONS, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
LAWRENCE R. BELLMORE, JR.
Cross_defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
