Cases 11 - 18 of 18
In Re: INACTIVE Hanford, et al v.
as 2:2003cv09001
Plaintiff:
Annabelle Johnston, Susan Ann Quick Aske, Carla Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05546
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Advance Ross Corp , BNSF Railway Company, bp product north america, inc. and atlantic richfield company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America et al v. Advance Ross Sub Co et al
as 3:2015cv05548
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Washington , Puyallup Tribe of Indians and others
Defendant:
Advance Ross Sub Co, BNSF Railway Company, BP Products North America Inc and Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Phillips v. Arnold et al
as 2:2013cv00444
Plaintiff:
Mark E Phillips
Defendant:
Robert Morris Arnold, Jane Doe Arnold, Julia De Haan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Federal Trade Commission v. MCS Programs LLC et al
as 2:2009mc00015
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
MCS Programs LLC, United Savings Center Inc, USC Programs LLC and others
Federal Trade Commission v. MCS Programs, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv05380
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission and Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
MCS Programs, LLC, United Savings Center Inc, USC Programs LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
O'Neil v. Peak et al
as 2:2008cv01041
Plaintiff:
Sherri O'Neil
Defendant:
Robert Morris Peak, Courtiff Inc, Rori Enterprises Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris et al v. Equities First Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2008cv05126
Plaintiff:
Brenda Morris and Randy Morris
Defendant:
Equities First Holdings LLC and Alexander C Christy, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
