Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Murphy et al
as 0:2010cv02773
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Gregory Murphy, Dooley's Inc. and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Moore et al v. Murphy Construction Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv03136
Plaintiff:
James E. Moore, James E. Moore, Tim McGough and others
Defendant:
Murphy Construction Services, Inc. and James A. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type:
Other Statutes
Powell et al v. Murphy et al
as 0:2009cv03137
Plaintiff:
John Powell and Devette Evans
Defendant:
John Murphy and Minneapolis, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Alkhafaji et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv03077
Plaintiff:
Yaarb Alkhafaji, Yaarb Alkhafaji, Yaarb Alkhafaji and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Murphy v. Regency Midwest Ventures Limited Partnership
as 0:2009cv02222
Plaintiff:
Lisa A. Murphy and Lisa A. Murphy
Defendant:
Regency Midwest Ventures Limited Partnership, Regency Midwest Ventures Limited Partnership and Regency Midwest Ventures Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 do Denial of Overtime Compensation
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
