Cases 11 - 20 of 28
City of East Wenatchee et al v. Kirby
as 2:2012mc00139
Petitioner:
City of East Wenatchee and James Marshall
Respondent:
Mike Kirby
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al v. Building and Construction Trades Department et al
as 2:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America , Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters , Southwest Carpenters JATC and others
Defendant:
Building and Construction Trades Department , Mark Ayers , Ed Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
McKee v. Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
as 2:2011cv05075
Plaintiff:
Ryan P McKee
Defendant:
Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hwang v. Bishop White Marshall and Weibel PS
as 2:2011cv00673
Plaintiff:
Woon Hwang
Defendant:
Bishop White Marshall and Weibel PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cho v. Bishop White Marshall and Weibel, PS
as 2:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
Christian Cho
Defendant:
Bishop White Marshall and Weibel, PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marshall v. Bonded Adjustment Company et al
as 2:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Andrew Marshall
Defendant:
- Bonded Adjustment Company and Spokane Emergency Physicians PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller et al v. Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
as 2:2010cv00425
Plaintiff:
Aaron Miller and Audrie Miller
Defendant:
Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cook v. Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
as 2:2010cv01924
Plaintiff:
Curtis J Cook
Defendant:
Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
