Cases 11 - 20 of 179
Gyamfi v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00695
Petitioner:
Clement Gyamfi
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evstigneeva v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00642
Petitioner:
Natalia Evstigneeva
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Alamgir v. Novak et al
as 1:2008cv00579
Petitioner:
Shoaib Alamgir
Respondent:
Paul Novak, Emilio Gonzalez and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Keshk v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv00553
Plaintiff:
Sameh F. Keshk
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and Jonathan Scharfen
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kazemi v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00511
Petitioner:
Mariam Kazemi
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Joya v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00512
Petitioner:
Abdul Joya
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Betty Brite Cleaners v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00456
Plaintiff:
Betty Brite Cleaners
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Gerald Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
El Dak v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00426
Petitioner:
Ahmed E. El Dak
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Michael Chertoff, Chief Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
El Dak v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00425
Petitioner:
Ahmed E. El Dak
Respondent:
Susan P. Dibbins, Michael Chertoff, Chief Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shooshtarian v. Dibbins et al
as 1:2008cv00427
Plaintiff:
Shahrzad Shooshtarian
Defendant:
Susan Dibbins, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
