Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Paramount Pictures Corporation et al v. Doe
as 5:2009mc80015
Plaintiff:
Paramount Pictures Corporation and Universal City Studios Productions LLLP
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Paramount Pictures Corporation et al v. Doe
as 5:2009cv80015
Plaintiff:
Paramount Pictures Corporation and Universal City Studios Productions LLLP
Defendant:
John Doe
Stanley Donen v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv03383
Plaintiff:
Stanley Donen
Defendant:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, The Gap, Inc. and Viacom Consumer Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Paramount Pictures Corporation et al v. Pullmylink.com et al
as 2:2008cv02530
Defendant:
DOES, Riyaz Jiwani and Pullmylink.com
Plaintiff:
Paramount Pictures Corporation and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al v. Gowell Electronic Limited
as 2:2008cv04074
Defendant:
Gowell Electronic Limited
Plaintiff:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios LLLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Viacom International Inc. et al v. YouTube, Inc. et al
as 5:2008mc80139
Plaintiff:
Viacom International Inc., Comedy Partners, Country Music Television, Inc. and others
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc., YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC and others
3rd Party Defendant:
Auditude, Inc. and Auditude, Inc.
Viacom International Inc. et al v. YouTube, Inc. et al
as 3:2008mc80129
Plaintiff:
Viacom International Inc., Viacom International Inc., Viacom International Inc. and others
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc., YouTube, Inc., YouTube, Inc. and others
NBC Universal, Inc. et al v. You Tube, Inc.
as 3:2008mc80087
Plaintiff:
NBC Universal, Inc. and Paramount Pictures Corporation
Defendant:
You Tube, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
