Cases 11 - 20 of 2,083
Crespo v. Carvajal
as 24-1138
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRESPO, ANTHONY PODIAS, PEDRO ESPADA, JR. and others
Intervenor:
CHENSHIN CHAN and DAVID NAGY
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Northeast Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, WARDEN HERMAN QUAY, III, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn, KIMBERLY ASK-CARLSON, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn and others
Moore v. Stolsig, et al.
as 24-2704
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MOE MOORE
Defendant:
MELISSA STOLSIG, JONNA DONLAP, ALICIA NIX and others
Oliver v. Campbell
as 24-2696
Petitioner:
ANTHONY C. OLIVER
Respondent:
TAMMY L. CAMPBELL, Warden of California State Prison, Corcoran
Lotches v. Premo
as 24-2652
Petitioner:
ERNEST N. LOTCHES
Respondent:
JEFF PREMO, as Superintendent, Oregon State Prison
BAILEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Pamela BAILEY d/b/a More Than Our Crimes
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Fields v. Foss, et al.
as 24-2377
Plaintiff:
DEVONTE SHAWN DUPREE FIELDS
Defendant:
C. CALDERON, S. ALVAREZ, D. MAGANA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Sivak v. Ramirez, et al.
as 24-2395
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
RAMIREZ, Sergeant, ISCI, AARON FODGE, Prison Employee, R. FINDEISEN, Prison Employee and others
Gonzalez v. Herrera, et al.
as 24-2371
Petitioner:
LEON ABEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
JUAN HERRERA, Bureau of Prisons Residential Reentry Manager for Long Beach, in his official capacity and COLLETTE PETERS, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in her official capacity
DePriest v. Andes
as 24-2261
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEPRIEST
Respondent:
CHANCE ANDES, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
