Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 59
US v. Hunter Dent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2147
Plaintiff: DR. MICHAEL MAYES, Relator, KAYLA WEBSTER, Relator, CHRIS RIEDEL and others
Defendant: FLOYD CALHOUN DENT, III, BERKELEY HEARTLAB, INC., SINGULEX INC. and others
Interested Party: TRINI "D" ISLAND, LLC, CHRISTINA M. DENT, COBALT HEALTHCARE CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED and others
Not Yet Classified: HUNTER GARRETT DENT, L.D., minor child and HAILEY SHANNON DENT
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the State of North Carolina, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin, ex rel
Shane Dragoo v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
as CAC/2:19-CV-07223
Plaintiff: Shane Dragoo
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
Cinelli et al v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
as NJ/2:19-CV-16982
Plaintiff: Cinelli
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
FRENCH v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED et al
as NJ/2:19-CV-14956
Plaintiff: FRENCH
Defendant: QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED
Mark Woods v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, et al
as CAC/2:19-CV-05817
Plaintiff: Mark Woods
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
CHUHA v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED et al
as PAW/2:19-CV-00742
Plaintiff: CHUHA
Defendant: QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED
Cinelli et al v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
as NYS/7:19-CV-05803
Plaintiff: Cinelli
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
Webb v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
as ILN/1:19-CV-04157
Plaintiff: Webb
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as CAC/2:19-CV-05071
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROGGE et al v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED et al
as NJ/2:19-CV-13648
Plaintiff: ROGGE
Defendant: QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?