Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2016mc00044
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
JON WINSTON ACKERSON, GARLAN LEIGH ADAMS, BRADLEY JOHNSTON ADAMSKY and others
SMOCK v. BASS & ASSOCIATES, PC
as 1:2016cv00798
Defendant:
BASS & ASSOCIATES, PC
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY SMOCK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ACTGG Partnership LLP et al v. Alexander et al
as 1:2016mc00001
Plaintiff:
ACTGG Partnership LLP
Defendant:
Ray Alexander and Bruce L Nelson
Claimant:
Grant F Shipley of Shipley & Associates
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RAY et al v. WELLPOINT INC.
as 1:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
TRENT KELSO and RYAN RAY
Defendant:
WELLPOINT INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
