Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Jane Doe LS 259 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04370
Plaintiff: Jane Doe LS 259
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and others
LS 293 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04364
Plaintiff: LS 293 and Jane Doe LS 293
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc.,, Rasier, LLC and others
LS 155 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04374
Plaintiff: LS 155 and Jane Doe LS 155
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc.,, Rasier, LLC and others
LS 249 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04369
Plaintiff: LS 249 and Jane Doe LS 249
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and others
LS 67 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04366
Plaintiff: LS 67 and Jane Doe LS 67
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc.,, Rasier, LLC and others
Jane Doe LS 91 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as CAN/4:23-CV-04368
Plaintiff: Jane Doe LS 91
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc.,, Rasier, LLC and others
David Fluss v. USDC-CALA
as 20-71383
Petitioner: DAVID FLUSS
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Not Classified By Court: RASIER, LLC, RASIER-CA, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Paul O'Hanlon, et al v. Uber Technologies Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-3891
Plaintiff / Appellee: IRMA ALLEN, an individual, GAYLE LEWANDOWSKI, an individual, JONATHAN ROBISON, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: RASIER CA LLC, a Delaware Corporation, RASIER LLC, a Delaware Corporation and UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC, a Delaware Corporation
SC Innovations, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv07440
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, Rasier-NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff: SC Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv05546
Defendant: UATC, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Diva Limousine, Ltd.
Not Classified By Court: Martin POSH ENTERPRISES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?